Final Destination: Bloodlines just opened to massive numbers — is this franchise resurrection a genuine horror triumph, or are we just paying for nostalgia we can't shake?

• O

  Omar1mo ago

  My mum refused to get on a rollercoaster for six years after watching Final Destination 3 in 2006. Six years. That franchise did more for irrational phobia proliferation than anything else in cinema history and I say that as a compliment.

  203Reply
• D

  Drew1mo ago

  lol at anyone calling a movie where a guy gets shredded by a lawn mower a 'meditation on mortality anxiety'

  201Reply
• N

  Noah1mo ago

  I saw it opening weekend and genuinely screamed three times. Three. I'm a 34-year-old man who watches horror constantly. If a movie can still do that to me in 2025 it has EARNED its numbers, nostalgia or not.

  187Reply
• ST

  Sam T.1mo ago

  my whole friend group has a tradition of seeing every Final Destination on opening night going back to 2003. we've lost members to moves, marriages, one to something we don't talk about. but there were seven of us in that theater last weekend and it felt like 2003 again for two hours. is that nostalgia? yeah. is it also real? absolutely yeah.

  178Reply
• N9

  Noah 921mo ago

  all i know is that i haven't touched a escalator comfortably since 2000 and after watching Bloodlines i can add 'dental offices' and 'glass elevators' to the list. the movie is WORKING on me physiologically. isn't that the entire job description of horror

  166Reply
• ES

  Elena S.1mo ago

  I wrote my film studies dissertation on the Final Destination series in 2018 and argued it was an underrated meditation on mortality anxiety in post-9/11 America. My professor gave me a C and called it 'a stretch.' I feel vindicated every time a new one does well.

  156Reply
• M

  Maya1mo ago

  elaborate death choreography is literally the entire promise of the franchise. you're complaining that a pizza restaurant serves pizza

  145Reply
• T

  Theo1mo ago

  Okay can we just be honest that the ORIGINAL Final Destination was genuinely ahead of its time? The idea that Death itself is the villain with no face and no motive was philosophically interesting in 2000. Bloodlines doesn't come close to recreating that feeling, it just recreates the set pieces.

  142Reply
• N

  Nina1mo ago

  The opening numbers prove nothing except that marketing budgets are enormous. Morbius opened huge too. We need to stop treating opening weekends as quality scores.

  134Reply
• F

  Feli1mo ago

  ive seen all six now and bloodlines sits comfortably at third best for me behind the original and part 5. not a masterpiece, not a cash grab, just a really solid entry in a franchise that understands exactly what it is. sometimes that's enough and we should let it be enough.

  124Reply
• ES

  Elena S.1mo ago

  hot take: Final Destination 5 is secretly the best one in the whole franchise and Bloodlines will never top the ending reveal they did there. fight me.

  119Reply
• P

  Priya1mo ago

  horror as a genre gets so much unfair intellectual snobbery. people will write essays about why a slow arthouse film about grief 'transcends genre' but the moment something is popular and fun and scary it gets dismissed. Bloodlines is allowed to just be a good scary movie

  113Reply
• T

  Theo1mo ago

  The fact that it's called BLOODlines and relies on family legacy storytelling means they're 100% setting up a cinematic universe expanded content situation. Mark my words. In three years there will be a Final Destination streaming show and I will not be okay.

  107Reply
• PR

  Priya R.1mo ago

  The 'bloodline curse' plot device is the laziest possible way to extend a franchise that narratively concluded perfectly at the end of part 5. They connected it back to the original flight beautifully. Bloodlines undoes that elegance for a check.

  97Reply
• Y

  Yuki1mo ago

  the death sequences are creative sure but the characters are literally just bodies waiting to die. no one in that theater learned a single character's name by the end. that's not horror, that's a theme park ride.

  94Reply
• R

  Ravi1mo ago

  counterpoint: the reason the films work is the theatrical experience of strangers collectively gasping and grabbing each other. a streaming show removes the entire social dimension that makes these movies events. some things should stay in cinemas.

  91Reply
• N

  Nina1mo ago

  both things can be true simultaneously. the lawn mower scene AND the existential dread are real. that's actually kind of the genius of the franchise when it's working properly

  89Reply
• RM

  Reese M.1mo ago

  The practical effects in Bloodlines are stunning, I'll give it that. There's one sequence involving a suspension bridge that made half the audience cover their eyes. If you're evaluating it purely as craft, the technical team deserves real recognition.

  88Reply
• JK

  Jordan K.1mo ago

  I think people conflating 'enjoyable' with 'good' is exactly what lets studios keep serving us competent mediocrity forever. Bloodlines is enjoyable. That doesn't mean it's good. We're allowed to hold both positions.

  82Reply
• C

  Casey1mo ago

  The bloodline concept actually fixes one of the biggest logical problems in the series — why does Death care about these random groups of people? Now there's a lineage reason. It's not deep but it's coherent, which is more than parts 4 and 5 managed.

  78Reply
• S

  Sam1mo ago

  went with my teenage daughter who'd never seen any of them and she was completely lost during all the callbacks and easter eggs. that's a problem. if your movie only fully works for people who've seen the previous five films you've made something exclusive not something good

  72Reply
• DS

  Drew S.1mo ago

  okay but Morbius comparison is genuinely unfair. Bloodlines is actually receiving positive reviews. you can't handwave that away just because you're cynical about studios.

  67Reply
• A

  Alex1mo ago

  nostalgia cash grab nostalgia cash grab nostalgia cash grab. it's literally in the title. BLOODLINES. as in 'we need a new angle because we ran out of freak accidents.' studios think adding family lore makes it deeper. it doesn't.

  61Reply
• D

  Diego1mo ago

  The real question is whether Bloodlines does anything to justify its existence beyond 'people like this IP.' Does it have a theme? A point of view? Or is it just elaborate death choreography with a legacy sequel wrapper?

  60Reply
• OS

  Omar S.1mo ago

  i genuinely don't understand why people act like creativity and nostalgia are opposites. plenty of nostalgic projects are also genuinely creative. and plenty of 'original' films are boring garbage. judge the movie not the marketing category it fits into

  55Reply
• M

  Marco1mo ago

  a Final Destination show could actually be incredible if each episode followed a different group. anthology format. different director each episode. stop being so negative about everything

  53Reply
• R

  Ravi1mo ago

  What I want to know is whether they've finally figured out pacing. Parts 2 and 4 had the problem where you'd get an amazing death scene and then thirty minutes of teenagers arguing in a living room. Does Bloodlines fix that?

  44Reply

More debates people can't stop arguing about