The Hebrew 'almah' (young woman) became 'virgin' in Greek and launched a doctrine. 'Camel through the eye of a needle' may be a mistranslated 'rope'. Most believers have never read a word of the original Hebrew, Greek, or Arabic. So are billions worshipping a translator's choices — and would your faith survive reading the text in its first language? Pick a side.
Join the debate to comment
Reading is free. Members pay to post — that's why it stays clean.
Add your commentThe almah/virgin one is the heavyweight. An entire virgin-birth doctrine may rest on a Greek translator picking the wrong word for 'young woman'. Billions of people, two thousand years of theology, possibly hanging on one mistranslation. Sit with that.
Which is the most honest position of any faith, frankly. Christianity hands you 'the Word of God' in English and lets you forget a translator stood between you and it. Islam at least makes you acknowledge the gap.
Reading in translation is fine for meaning, fatal for proof-texting. You can get the gist of 'love your enemies' in any language. You cannot build a precise doctrine of the Trinity on prepositions that don't even exist the same way in Greek and English.
That's actually the most devastating version of the point, not a defense. If even native readers had to interpret, then 'the clear word of God' never existed for anyone. There was always a human mind deciding what it meant.
Translation isn't betrayal, it's interpretation, and EVERY reading is interpretation, even in the original. The ancient Hebrew reader also had to decide what 'almah' meant. There's no pristine unmediated text anywhere. It's interpretation all the way down.
Notice the move though — when the translation helps the doctrine, suddenly the ancient translators were geniuses with deep cultural insight. When it hurts, they were fallible men. The standard flips to protect the conclusion every time.
I studied Koine Greek specifically to stop trusting other people's translations. Best and worst decision of my faith life. You gain precision and lose comfort. Half the verses I'd built my life on are blurrier in the original than any English Bible admits.
As an Arabic speaker reading the Quran, I promise you the English 'translations' are not the same experience. The rhythm, the double meanings, the wordplay — gone. Non-Arabic Muslims are reading a faithful summary, not the thing itself. Islam basically admits this by refusing to call translations 'the Quran'.
Or the Greek translators 200 years before Jesus understood the connotation better than a modern skeptic with a lexicon app. 'Almah' implied an unmarried young woman, which in that culture meant virgin. You're flattening a cultural word into a dictionary gloss.
That one genuinely rocked me too. If 'eternal' punishment is actually 'age-enduring' correction, that's not a footnote, that's a completely different God.
Jewish learning takes this seriously — you're expected to wrestle with the Hebrew, the vowel pointings that were added later, the words with five meanings. The idea that a clean English sentence captures it is treated as naive from day one.
Would my faith survive the original languages? Mine did, but it came out humbler and looser. I stopped saying 'the Bible clearly says' because in the original, very little is clear. That phrase is a translation artifact.
Ex-evangelical. The day I learned 'eternal' (aionios) might mean 'of an age / age-long' rather than 'forever' I realized the entire doctrine of eternal hell could hang on a translation choice. The most terrifying idea in my childhood, maybe a word pick.
The camel/rope thing is overstated — most scholars think 'camel' is original and it's deliberate hyperbole, Jesus being vivid. But the fact that we're even DEBATING whether it's a camel or a rope proves the larger point: you don't actually know what was said.
Most believers can't read the original and never will, so functionally they're trusting a committee of scholars they've never met made good calls. That's fine — but it's faith in translators, which is a very different thing from faith in God directly.
Is it wrong to choose not to have children just because you don't want to?
110 comments
Netflix's 'Adolescence' shows a teenage boy becoming a killer — did the show actually get modern boyhood right, or did it miss the point entirely?
109 comments
Would you still eat meat if you had to kill the animal yourself?
109 comments
Is judging someone by their height as shallow as judging by their weight?
108 comments