The new Karate Kid film just dropped, combining the Jackie Chan and Ralph Macchio storylines into one movie — and people are already divided. Is blending two generations of the franchise an exciting evolution, or is this just Sony desperately strip-mining nostalgia for a quick box office win?
Join the debate to comment
Reading is free. Members pay to post — that's why it stays clean.
Add your commenthot take: Mr. Miyagi dying was the end of the Karate Kid story. Everything after that is just fanfiction with a budget.
What I will say is that the relationship between the two mentor characters is the most interesting dynamic in the film and they don't spend nearly enough time on it. That movie — two old martial arts masters from different traditions navigating ego and respect — I would watch that in a heartbeat.
took my nephew who is 9. he was riveted the entire runtime. asked me to sign him up for karate class on the drive home. if a movie makes a kid want to go do something physical and disciplined, that's a win i will not argue against
The entire premise is lazy. Instead of building something genuinely new with an Asian-American lead, they had to drag Daniel LaRusso back in to give white audiences a comfort blanket. Hollywood does this every single time.
the audience also asked for Transformers 5 and 6. audience demand is not quality control
it works as a standalone film TOO? bro that should be the baseline minimum not a selling point 😭
This is my hill: the original 1984 film is one of the most perfectly constructed underdog stories ever put on screen and no amount of sequels, reboots, or well-intentioned legacy films can touch what it did. Not because it's nostalgia, but because the screenplay is just genuinely that good.
My dad took me to see the original 1984 film in the theater. He passed away three years ago. Taking my own son to see this one this weekend and I'm already emotional about it. Some things are bigger than film criticism.
the fact that the best movie in the film is the background movie about the side characters says everything you need to know
Cobra Kai on Netflix spent 5 seasons doing incredibly nuanced character work with these same characters. That show earned its emotional moments. This film feels like a two-hour highlight reel by comparison.
^ okay this is actually the most wholesome comment on this entire thread and I'm choosing to end my cynicism here
that's a false equivalence and you know it. shakespeare didn't make Romeo and Juliet: Legends featuring Benedict Cumberbatch as a returning fan favorite mentor to give audiences a safety net
that's not a hot take that's literally just correct and the film kind of proves it
Jackie Chan is 70 years old and still doing this. Absolute legend. I will watch anything he is in, full stop, no questions asked.
y'all are having the same argument about this movie that people had about Top Gun Maverick and that film ended up being genuinely excellent and proved everyone wrong. maybe sit with the uncertainty a bit
the villain in this film has the worst motivation i have seen in a major studio release in years. genuinely could not tell you why he was doing what he was doing after sitting through the whole movie
Watched it last night. Honestly? It made me feel things I wasn't expecting. The scene where both mentors are in the same room and there's that unspoken respect between them — I actually teared up a little. Maybe I'm just old.
genuinely asking: at what point does nostalgia become a crutch that prevents an industry from developing new stars? because Ben Wang is clearly talented and i worry that having Macchio there means audiences will never fully accept him as THE guy on his own terms
I'm 16 and never watched the original. This movie was sick. The training montages go hard. Idk why grown adults are so upset about a movie they chose to watch.
okay but be honest - if this movie had a completely unknown cast and no legacy connection, would ANYONE be talking about it? the answer is no and we all know it
Not every film needs to be a deconstruction of the genre or some bold new artistic statement. Sometimes people just want to see a kid learn karate and grow as a person. That's a complete and valid story.
The legacy sequel format is just structurally designed to exploit emotional investment you built elsewhere. It's not filmmaking, it's emotional debt collection.
Every generation thinks their version of something was the definitive one. Baby Boomers thought their music was the peak of music. Gen X thought their film era was the peak of cinema. Millennials doing the same thing now with the original Karate Kid. It's a cycle.
The fight choreography is genuinely impressive. People are so busy arguing about legacy and reboots that they're sleeping on the actual craft on screen. Go watch it before forming an opinion based on Twitter takes.
Saw it with my girlfriend who has never seen ANY Karate Kid film. She loved it. Said it was sweet and the action was fun. So clearly it works as a standalone film too. That matters.
^ this comment is why generational discourse is so exhausting. the criticism isn't 'the movie made me sad' it's about what it signals about studio risk-aversion in the industry as a whole
I think people need to separate 'is this a great film' from 'is this a fun time at the movies.' It's clearly the second thing and there's room in the world for that.
As someone who teaches martial arts, the technical accuracy of the karate in this film is much better than most Hollywood productions. Small detail but it matters to people who train.
counterpoint: Ralph Macchio is genuinely great in this and you can tell he cares deeply about the character. that's not nostalgia bait, that's an actor honoring something he built over 40 years
the problem is they completely sidelined Mr Han's storyline from the 2010 film. that movie had genuine heart and introduced kung fu to a whole new generation. this film treats it like a footnote and that's disrespectful honestly
Honestly the 2010 reboot with Jaden Smith gets way too little credit. It had a lot of genuine warmth and Beijing was visually stunning. This new one feels like it's embarrassed to acknowledge that film exists.
it was fine. not bad. not great. just... fine. which is somehow worse than if it was terrible lol
I think the real question people need to ask is whether Ben Wang as Li Fong actually carries the film. Because if the new lead doesn't work, none of the nostalgia in the world saves it. And I think he does work, actually.
Can we acknowledge that Sony has been trying to make Karate Kid happen again since 2010 and it keeps working commercially? At some point you have to admit the audience is asking for this.
People act like Hollywood only makes reboots but this same summer has multiple original films in theaters. The outrage is selective. Nobody complains about the 47th superhero sequel but somehow THIS is where we draw the line?
the pacing in the second act just falls apart completely. it's like they forgot there was a movie happening and decided to do a twenty minute feelings talk instead
Am I the only one who thinks crossover films like this are actually harder to write than standalone ones? You have to honor multiple canons, multiple fan bases, and still tell a coherent new story. Give the writers some credit.
I genuinely don't understand the nostalgia criticism. The Lion King is a story humans have been retelling for thousands of years. Romeo and Juliet has been adapted over 50 times. Stories getting retold is not a crisis, it's culture.
The soundtrack choices were genuinely weird and took me out of the movie twice. Who approved the third act music? It clashed so badly with the tone they'd built.
Is it wrong to choose not to have children just because you don't want to?
110 comments
Would you still eat meat if you had to kill the animal yourself?
109 comments
Netflix's 'Adolescence' shows a teenage boy becoming a killer — did the show actually get modern boyhood right, or did it miss the point entirely?
109 comments
Should we genetically edit babies to remove diseases if we can?
108 comments