Politeness and family love, or quietly teaching a kid their 'no' doesn't count? Where does respect for elders end and a child's autonomy begin?
Join the debate to comment
Reading is free. Members pay to post — that's why it stays clean.
Add your commentI forced my daughter to hug her uncle once. She was seven. She cried the whole car ride home and couldn't tell me why. I never did it again. I don't know if anything happened. Maybe she was just tired. But the 'maybe' lives in me permanently now and I will never make that call again.
This comment broke me a little. That 'maybe' is exactly it. The cost of being wrong is too high.
The cost of being wrong in the OTHER direction is a generation that can't maintain close relationships or show basic warmth to people who love them. Both 'wrong' directions have costs.
Teaching a kid that their body is theirs to share is the single best protection you can give them. 'Just hug grandpa' undoes that lesson in one sentence.
I'm a pediatric therapist. The research on bodily autonomy in early childhood is not ambiguous. Every time we override a child's 'no' to physical contact, we weaken their ability to trust that boundary in higher-stakes situations. This isn't ideology, it's developmental science.
My daughter once cried because she didn't want to hug my mother-in-law goodbye. My MIL quietly said 'that's okay sweetheart, I'll be here next time' and crouched down and waved at her instead. My daughter ran back and hugged her on her own 30 seconds later. That woman understood children better than most parenting books I've read.
Respectfully, your MIL story is sweet but it's also survivorship bias. Not every kid runs back. Some kids just... don't. And that relative is still left standing there. Real life isn't always a heartwarming resolution.
okay but even in that case? the answer is still not to FORCE the kid. the answer is that the adult manages their feelings like an adult. grandma being sad for a moment is survivable.
I teach kindergarten. The kids who have been taught their 'no' is respected are the ones who come to tell me when something feels wrong. Every time. The kids who've been taught to override discomfort to please adults go quiet instead. I know which group I want.
My son is autistic and has sensory issues. Touch is genuinely painful or overwhelming for him sometimes. When relatives insist on hugging him because 'he's family' and look at ME like I'm a bad parent for not enforcing it, something boils up in me that I can barely put into words. Not all children have the same relationship with physical touch. Full stop.
This is such an important point that gets completely lost in the general debate. Neurodivergent kids aside, some neurotypical kids are just highly sensitive. My daughter screams during haircuts. She's not being dramatic. Her nervous system is genuinely overwhelmed. Anyone who's never experienced that with their own kid is arguing in a vacuum.
There is a massive difference between a child not wanting to hug someone because they're shy versus a child having a visceral, persistent, specific aversion to one particular person. Parents need to be paying close enough attention to know which one they're dealing with.
My grandmother passed last year. My kids were 5 and 7. They weren't huggy kids with her at first. We never forced it. By her last Christmas they were crawling all over her. They got to choose that. They'll have that memory as something they chose. I'm glad we waited.
The 'it's just a hug' crowd never asks why the child doesn't want to give it. That question matters more than the hug.
If you force a child to hug someone and that person turns out to be an abuser, you have personally communicated to your child that you will override their instincts to keep adults comfortable. Think about what that does to whether they ever tell you anything.
Why does every conversation about 'should kids hug grandma' immediately spiral into abuse scenarios? Most families are fine. Most relatives are safe. The paranoia has become the harm.
I'm 62 years old. I was forced to hug relatives constantly as a child in the 1970s. I'm fine. My siblings are fine. My cousins are fine. At some point the generation that survived being raised without carseats and bike helmets is going to have to gently ask whether we are actually optimizing children's lives or just optimizing our own anxiety about being seen as good parents.
The framing of this whole debate drives me insane. Nobody's saying put a legal contract in front of your four-year-old before Thanksgiving dinner. We're talking about whether you FORCE them. As in physically push a crying child into an adult's arms. That's the thing being debated. Can we please argue about the actual thing?
My dad used to say "go give grandma a hug or she'll think you don't love her." So I learned to hug people to manage THEIR emotions even when I didn't want to. Spent my whole adult life in therapy unlearning that particular gift.
My son went through a phase where he wouldn't hug ANYONE — me, his dad, his best friend's mom he adored. It was sensory. Nothing to do with safety. We let him lead it and at 9 he's the most affectionate kid you've ever met. Forcing it would have backfired so badly.
The most honest thing I can say: I make my kids hug grandma and I know it's probably not the theoretically correct choice and I do it anyway because the moment is already awkward and I panic and I'm not proud of it. Most parents are muddling through in real time, not executing a philosophy.
Except 'muddling through' in one direction can have real consequences and 'muddling through' in the other direction just means grandma got a wave instead of a hug. The stakes are not symmetric.
This is the most honest comment on here and I deeply respect it. We are all just failing in slightly different directions and pretending we're not.
What's wild to me is that we're debating the child's agency here but nobody is questioning why the adult relative NEEDS the hug so badly that they'll make a child uncomfortable to get it. That neediness is worth examining.
I'm a child psychologist and the research here is actually not as settled as Twitter would have you believe. Forced physical affection can erode trust in some children. In others — particularly very young children — the enforcement of social rituals seems to have negligible lasting effect. What matters enormously is tone, context, and whether the child feels generally respected and heard in the broader relationship. A single 'give grandma a hug' is not a defining moment for most kids. A pattern of dismissing their expressed distress absolutely can be.
The compromise nobody ever implements: talk to the relative BEFORE the gathering. Tell grandpa that Mia is going through a phase and loves blowing kisses instead. Manage it on the adult side. Why is this so hard.
Because some grandparents genuinely won't accept this and will guilt trip you in real time with the kid watching. That's the actual scenario people are navigating.
Not everything your parents did that caused you difficulty is a trauma that required creating a whole new parenting philosophy to prevent.
Bold of you to diagnose what does and doesn't count as significant from a stranger's lived experience on the internet.
Hot take: the parents who are most vocally anti-forced-hug are often the same parents who then post photos of their sleeping children to 50,000 strangers on Instagram without a second thought. The consistency of 'my child's body and privacy are sacred' is interesting to examine.
The alternative nobody considers: teach children BOTH that their body is theirs AND that sometimes in life we do things we don't feel like doing out of love for others. Both are true. Both are important life lessons. A forced hug CAN be the wrong call. It can also be a moment where you teach a kid that love sometimes asks something of us. Context is everything.
I feel like people have completely forgotten that children can be TAUGHT to want to be affectionate. It's not either 'they naturally want to' or 'force them.' You can spend years building warmth, talking about how much grandpa loves them, sharing stories, making those relationships feel real and important — and THEN the hug often just happens naturally. Parenting is long game not reaction to a single moment at the door.
The thing that nobody talks about: HOW you prompt the hug matters as much as whether you do. 'Go hug grandpa RIGHT NOW' while grandpa stands there watching the negotiation is completely different from a quiet private word — 'she's been sick, it would mean a lot.' Kids understand context when you give it to them. They're not tiny refusal machines.
My grandmother cried every Christmas because my cousin wouldn't hug her. We're now supposed to prioritize a four-year-old's vague discomfort over an 80-year-old woman's feelings? I'm sorry but no.
The real issue is adults who take it personally when a small child doesn't want physical contact. That's the adults' emotional regulation problem, not the child's job to fix.
grew up in a culture where you kiss EVERY adult relative on both cheeks every time you see them and every time you leave. cousins, aunts, neighbors who were basically family. I hated it as a kid but honestly? I think it built something in me. a comfort with physical warmth I see a lot of my friends lack. not everything is damage.
The carseat comparison is interesting because we DID change carseats and it DID save lives and people in the 80s said the same 'we survived without them' thing. Survival is not the same as optimal.
Grew up in a culture where you kiss every adult on the cheek no exceptions. Did it make me a victim? No. Did it build family bonds? Yes. Did it sometimes make me uncomfortable? Also yes. All three things can be true.
Cultural context matters enormously here and the very American framing of 'my body my choice applies to toddler hugs' erases a lot of how family connection actually works in most of the world.
The 'it's cultural' defense has been used to justify a lot of things that still caused harm. Culture doesn't automatically make something okay for children.
nobody is saying it causes harm to hug grandma. that's the point. you lot have completely lost the plot
For what it's worth I think there's a difference between 'you must hug this person right now' and 'we show love to family in our household.' One is a command in the moment. One is a value you're instilling over time. People are arguing past each other because they're talking about different things.
Did anyone stop to think that maybe grandparents should just... not make it weird? Like if a kid doesn't want to hug, smile at them, wave, move on. The ones who push for the hug anyway are honestly the problem here.
I agree with this 100%. My mother-in-law used to do this thing where she'd crouch down, hold her arms open, and just WAIT. Staring at my daughter. And then look hurt when she hid behind my leg. That's emotional manipulation of a toddler, not a loving greeting.
Every time I see this debate I think about the grandparents who only see these kids twice a year and are watching their grandchildren grow up at a distance and just want one hug. And then their adult child turns it into a lesson in bodily autonomy. And the grandparent goes home and cries. Those people exist. Their hurt is real too.
I think the framing of this question is wrong. The choice isn't 'force hug vs. teach no.' The choice is 'what kind of relationship do you want your child to have with their body, and with this relative?' Answer that and the hugging question answers itself.
There's also something to be said for just... modeling. If I as a parent want my child to be affectionate and warm, I should be affectionate and warm. They learn way more from watching me hug my own parents genuinely than from being forced to replicate the gesture.
counterpoint: grandma's feelings about not getting a hug are also valid and we just... don't talk about that side ever
Genuine question for the "let kids choose" side: do you also let kids choose not to say thank you, not to share toys, not to look adults in the eye? Or is physical touch the only area where their preference is law? Asking sincerely.
Yes actually, I do let my kids choose most of those things, and I model the behavior I want instead of forcing it. Shocking results: they're quite polite because they've seen why it matters, not because they fear consequences.
Ok but there's a real difference between manners (social conventions) and physical touch (bodily autonomy). Conflating them is doing a lot of work in this debate.
I genuinely feel for those grandparents but the solution is for the GRANDPARENT to build a relationship where the kid WANTS to hug them. Not to override the kid's reluctance. Love doesn't come from obligation.
I keep coming back to this: what exactly are we so afraid of communicating to our kids? That sometimes they have to do mildly uncomfortable things? Because that is... life? I want my kids to have bodily autonomy AND grit AND empathy AND the understanding that their comfort is not the only thing in the room. A single hug can be the wrong move. It can also just be a hug.
The silent victims in this whole debate: children who WANTED to hug the relative, saw the fuss being made, and then felt weird about their own natural affection. Over-correcting has real costs too.
Even if they're not, the point they're making is reasonable and calibrated. Why is 'cite your sources in a comment section' the move when someone says something nuanced, but nobody asked for citations from the trauma anecdotes?
This whole debate makes me sad for a generation growing up thinking every small social obligation is a violation. Life requires tolerating mild discomfort to maintain relationships. That's a lesson too.
There's a difference between mild social discomfort (speaking in front of people, trying new food) and physical touch. Physical touch is categorically different. You can't conflate them.
I don't know man. I remember being VERY uncomfortable being made to shake hands with adult men my dad worked with when I was like 8. The power imbalance of 'you must physically touch this grownup or be considered rude' is similar regardless of the gesture.
There's something a bit uncomfortable about how this debate almost always centers on hugging older relatives, but nobody bats an eye at kids being required to shake hands with adults in professional or formal contexts. Interesting what we decide to problematize.
That's fine for local grandparents who see the kid weekly. What about grandparents across the country who get four visits a year and there's just never time to 'build the relationship' before the visit ends? You're applying a theory that works in one circumstance and treating it as universal.
Honestly? I got forced to hug every single relative at every single gathering until I was maybe 14 and I turned out completely fine. Not traumatized. Not a pushover. Just... fine. People need to relax.
"I turned out fine" is the single least convincing argument in all of parenting debates and yet here we are again
Can't you though? Both involve making decisions about a child's body and identity without their consent. I actually think the commenter is onto something real even if it's uncomfortable.
There's a high-five, a wave, a fist-bump. 'Be warm to family' and 'override your child's no' are not the only two options people pretend they are.
Citation or you're just someone who typed 'I'm a child psychologist' into a comment box.
okay but like. are there any longitudinal studies showing adults who were made to hug grandma at age 6 have measurably worse outcomes than those who weren't. because if not then maybe pump the brakes on the 'this is exactly like carseat safety' comparison
ngl the real answer here is video calls and more frequent contact, not forcing a hug during the brief window you do have. familiarity breeds comfort.
Honestly? The fact that this debate exists probably means we're doing okay as a society. Like the thing we're agonizing over is whether kids should have to hug grandma. There are children in the world dealing with genuinely horrifying things and we are here carefully workshopping the hug. I don't mean that to dismiss the concerns. I just mean let's maybe maintain some perspective.
This is the 'there are starving children in Africa' argument dressed up in a cardigan. Real harm not being the biggest possible harm doesn't make it not worth examining.
Handshakes aren't the same thing??? A handshake is a brief formal greeting with zero bodily intimacy. A long squeeze from an adult you barely see? Different category entirely.
That's a completely different thing though. Digital presence vs. physical touch. You can't conflate those.
A hug for grandma isn't trauma, it's basic family warmth. We've turned ordinary affection into a consent seminar and grandparents are heartbroken.
I was forced to hug an uncle I instinctively hated. Years later we found out exactly why my gut was screaming. Listen to kids.
Is it wrong to choose not to have children just because you don't want to?
110 comments
Netflix's 'Adolescence' shows a teenage boy becoming a killer — did the show actually get modern boyhood right, or did it miss the point entirely?
109 comments
Would you still eat meat if you had to kill the animal yourself?
109 comments
Is judging someone by their height as shallow as judging by their weight?
108 comments