We invest 16 hours, fall in love, and then someone dies, leaves, or forgets. Is the heartbreak the point, or are writers just lazy with happy endings?
Join the debate to comment
Reading is free. Members pay to post — that's why it stays clean.
Add your commentA tragic ending is the lazy way to feel 'deep'. Killing the lead isn't profound, it's a writer who couldn't earn a happy ending.
Goblin, Uncontrollably Fond, A Moment to Remember — I'm still not over ANY of them and I never will be. They did that on purpose.
Korean storytelling has a whole tradition of 'han' — beautiful sorrow. It's not lazy, it's a cultural aesthetic you're not getting.
Real love stories in real life don't have clean endings either. The bittersweet ones are the honest ones.
I have started skipping the last episode of any drama with 'fate' in the synopsis. I protect my peace now.
We keep watching because we're optimists who believe THIS time they'll get the ending. We never learn. That's the real tragedy.
I cry, I scream, I rate it 10/10, I recommend it to a friend so they suffer too. The cycle is the genre.
If I wanted to be devastated I'd check my bank account. Let the fictional couple be HAPPY for once, I'm begging.
The 'forgets everything' amnesia trope specifically should be banned by international law.
A happy ending earned through 16 episodes of suffering hits harder than any death. Writers forgot that.
The tragedy is WHY we remember them. A happy ending fades. The ones that broke us live in our heads for years. That's the genius.
Bittersweet, fine. But some of these endings are just cruel for shock value and call it art.
Is it wrong to choose not to have children just because you don't want to?
110 comments
Netflix's 'Adolescence' shows a teenage boy becoming a killer — did the show actually get modern boyhood right, or did it miss the point entirely?
109 comments
Would you still eat meat if you had to kill the animal yourself?
109 comments
Is judging someone by their height as shallow as judging by their weight?
108 comments