Visitors wait 30 minutes in the drive-through expecting a revelation and walk away confused, while locals treat it like a sacred rite. Is the Double-Double actually elite, or has LA collectively gaslit itself?
Join the debate to comment
Reading is free. Members pay to post — that's why it stays clean.
Add your commentMy grandfather used to take me to the one on Sepulveda after my Little League games in the late 80s. He'd get a Neapolitan shake every single time. He passed in 2019. So yeah, maybe there's nostalgia involved for me personally. I'm not gonna pretend that's nothing. But also the burger is legitimately good so both things can be true and I'm tired of people acting like sentiment automatically disqualifies a food opinion.
Born and raised in Koreatown, and I will die on this hill: the Double-Double Animal Style is genuinely one of the best fast food items ever created. Full stop. It's not nostalgia. It's not a bit. The beef is fresh, never frozen, the price is still somehow reasonable, and the whole operation runs like clockwork. Every time I take someone from out of town they act like they're gonna hate it and then they're quiet for about four minutes straight while they eat. That silence IS the review.
Comparing Shake Shack to In-N-Out is like comparing a $90 sneaker to a $35 sneaker and going "see the expensive one is better." OBVIOUSLY Shake Shack is going to taste more luxurious, it costs almost twice as much per item. In-N-Out at its price point is untouchable. That's the actual argument. Nobody's saying a Double-Double beats a wagyu smashburger, we're saying nothing at $5.75 touches it in this city or probably this country. Different category entirely. Challenge me on that, anyone.
ok i'll be the heretic. moved here from chicago two years ago and i genuinely don't get it. i've tried it four times now trying to "get" it and it just tastes like... a burger? a fine burger? people look at me like i kicked a dog when i say that. the fries are actually bad, that part i'm confident about. someone explain the fries to me because they taste like cardboard sticks and everyone just accepts that.
The 1948 bun supplier thing is not accurate at all lol. They actually bake or source through their own distribution system and the recipe has changed over the decades. Please don't spread burger mythology as fact on a debate forum. That said — yes, the bun IS good, just don't make up reasons why.
The fries are bad because In-N-Out cuts them fresh from whole potatoes right there in the restaurant and doesn't pre-fry or freeze them, which actually makes them WORSE texture-wise than a frozen fry. It's an ironic situation where the "fresher" process produces an inferior product. Get them well-done if you order. You're welcome.
Honestly the real conversation nobody wants to have is that Shake Shack is better and has been better and Angelenos will gaslight THEMSELVES into oblivion before admitting a New York chain came out here and cooked them. I've said what I said. The patty smash, the sauce, even the fries — it's not close. Downvote me, I'm from Silver Lake and I can take it.
Hot take that's actually a COLD FACT: In-N-Out has been using the same bun supplier since 1948 and it's a proprietary recipe you literally cannot get anywhere else. That's why copies never taste the same. The whole sandwich is engineered as a system.
Is it wrong to choose not to have children just because you don't want to?
110 comments
Would you still eat meat if you had to kill the animal yourself?
109 comments
Are dating apps genuinely harder for men or for women?
108 comments
Is judging someone by their height as shallow as judging by their weight?
108 comments