Los Angeles Unified is massive, underfunded, and polarizing — yet thousands of families stretch their budgets thin to pay private school tuition. Are those parents making a wise investment or abandoning a public system that desperately needs their engagement?
Join the debate to comment
Reading is free. Members pay to post — that's why it stays clean.
Add your commentok but has anyone actually tried to get a kid with an IEP supported properly through LAUSD? because i have. three years of fighting for services my son was legally entitled to. three years of meetings where nothing changed. i didn't pull him out because i'm wealthy or panicking. i pulled him out because i was watching him fall apart. some of us don't have the luxury of being idealistic about institutions that are actively failing our children.
My grandfather helped BUILD Dorsey High School back in the day — actual construction worker, poured concrete on that site. Four generations of my family went through LAUSD. My kids go to LAUSD. Call it stubborn, call it loyalty, I don't care. This system belongs to us and I'm not giving it up without a fight. Some things are worth the difficulty.
Born and raised in Echo Park, went through LAUSD K-12, graduated from Cal State LA. Nobody in my family ever paid for private school and I turned out just fine. The people fleeing to Brentwood Academy or wherever are solving a problem for themselves while making it worse for everyone else. Your kid being in the system means YOU are in the system — fighting at board meetings, pushing for better teachers, demanding resources. The moment you opt out, you opt out of accountability too.
I actually used to teach at a LAUSD middle school in South LA for six years before I burned out completely. The narrative that private school parents are the villains is so frustrating to me. The actual villains are the legislators who've let this system rot for decades. I watched colleagues who genuinely loved those kids leave year after year because the conditions were impossible. Don't punch sideways. Punch up.
The assumption that engaged wealthy parents staying in LAUSD would "fix" it is honestly a little insulting. The problems are structural — pension obligations eating the budget, Sacramento underfunding, a bloated central office on Beaudry that seems allergically opposed to change. One more Palisades parent at a school site council isn't going to fix a $500 million deficit. Let's be real about the scale of what we're dealing with.
Also worth noting — private school doesn't automatically mean better outcomes, and there's decent research backing that up once you control for socioeconomic factors. A lot of what private schools are "selling" is the peer network and the college counseling, not some magical pedagogy. If your kid is well-supported at home they can absolutely thrive in public school. The tuition is really just buying anxiety relief for the parents more than anything measurable for the kid. I know that's spicy but someone had to say it.
Wealthy panic is EXACTLY what it is. These are the same parents who'd never send their kid on the bus but want a bumper sticker that says they believe in public education. Pick a lane.
lol at the people saying "just stay and fight for the system." Easy advice when your kid isn't the one sitting in a class of 38 with a sub three days a week because the district can't retain teachers. My oldest lost almost a full year of reading progress. A YEAR. You want me to sacrifice my child's development for a philosophical stance about public institutions? Hard pass.
Fun fact: private schools in California are not required to be accredited by any state body, have no obligation to follow state curriculum standards, and can turn away any student they want for any reason. But sure, pay $35,000 a year for that peace of mind.
Counterpoint nobody wants to hear: LAUSD actually has some legitimately excellent magnet programs — the ones nobody talks about because they require actually researching the system instead of just assuming it's broken. Harvard-Westlake costs $45k a year. The School for Advanced Studies costs nothing and has a rigorous program. But the magnet lottery is a whole thing and yes privilege affects who knows about it and pursues it. Still. The option exists.
I moved here from Chicago two years ago and honestly the discourse around LAUSD is unlike anything I've seen. Back home people complained but they stayed. Here it feels like private school is just... assumed for a certain class of Westside parent. My daughter goes to her neighborhood school in Silver Lake and it's genuinely great. Good teachers, engaged community, strong PTA. Not every LAUSD school is Fremont High circa 2003.
my husband and i make decent money but not private school money so we did what a lot of people do — moved to a district with better public schools. left our whole community in Los Feliz for Glendale. honestly still not sure it was worth it. at least in LAUSD our kids would've been around real LA, diverse classrooms, kids from everywhere. glendale is fine but it feels kind of... sanitized? miss the old neighborhood every single day.
Genuinely curious — for the people defending private school, do you think the parents doing it are doing anything morally wrong? Not asking to be combative, actually want to know. Because I go back and forth. I get the individual logic completely. It's the collective effect that troubles me. Every high-income family that leaves takes tax engagement, political will, and social capital with them. That's just true whether we like it or not.
Hot take incoming: LAUSD has about 600 schools. The system is so large that it essentially contains multitudes — some genuinely excellent schools and some that are genuinely a crisis. Treating it as one monolithic thing either to defend or attack is intellectually lazy. The zip code you're in within the district matters enormously and everyone pretending otherwise is either lying or hasn't looked at the API score data. Oh wait, they got rid of API scores. Which is a separate scandal.
Is it wrong to choose not to have children just because you don't want to?
110 comments
Would you still eat meat if you had to kill the animal yourself?
109 comments
Are dating apps genuinely harder for men or for women?
108 comments
Is judging someone by their height as shallow as judging by their weight?
108 comments