People paid a premium to live on a quiet few acres, only to watch a 200-lot subdivision break ground next door. Do original landowners deserve extra protection, or is development just the price of progress?
Join the debate to comment
Reading is free. Members pay to post — that's why it stays clean.
Add your commentMy neighbor Dale has lived on his acreage since 1994. Good man. Raises chickens, keeps his property immaculate. Last spring he came over and we watched the surveyors stake out the field behind his place. He didnt say a word the whole time. Just stood there. That image stuck with me. These arent abstract policy questions. These are peoples lives we rearranged without asking.
My family has owned 40 acres out here since 1987. We specifically chose this area because it was rural. We paid the taxes, maintained the land, dealt with the harsh winters, and now some developer from Omaha shows up with a bulldozer and suddenly our property value goes up on paper while our actual quality of life craters. Extra say? We deserve MORE than extra say. We deserve a legally binding buffer zone.
Counterpoint for the long-timers here: your property values have almost certainly doubled or tripled BECAUSE of this growth pressure. You cannot simultaneously cash in on appreciation driven by regional population growth and also demand that the growth stop. Pick one.
Sarpy County has approved something like 4,000 new residential units in the last decade and Springfield keeps getting the overflow from people priced out of Papillion and La Vista. The infrastructure genuinely cannot keep up. Roads, water, schools. This isnt about feelings, the actual pipes are too small. Any serious conversation about development has to start there.
okay so fun fact: springfield has had zoning ordinances since like the 1990s and if those original acreage buyers had lobbied harder back THEN to lock in agricultural preservation zones, we wouldnt even be having this argument now. the time to fight this was thirty years ago not when the excavators are already there lol
I want to respectfully challenge the long-timers on this forum: do any of you actually attend planning commission meetings? Because I go pretty regularly and I almost never see the acreage crowd there until AFTER a project is already approved. Show up before the vote, not after the groundbreaking. Serious question.
I moved here from Lincoln about two years ago specifically because I wanted space. But honestly? I think the people who've been here 20-30 years have earned some standing in these conversations that I just haven't. There's something to be said for community members who actually built relationships with the land and with each other before the rest of us showed up chasing the rural dream.
Technically speaking Nebraska state law already gives counties the ability to establish rural preservation districts and extraterritorial zoning jurisdiction. Springfield could have pursued those tools years ago. The blame here isnt entirely on developers. Local officials dropped the ball repeatedly and now everyone acts shocked that houses are appearing.
Hard disagree. You don't own the view. You don't own the surrounding land. Never did. That's not how property rights work in Nebraska or anywhere else.
Nope. Extra rights based on how long you owned land is just NIMBYism with a sentimental coating. Young families need somewhere affordable to live too. Springfield isnt a museum.
Is it wrong to choose not to have children just because you don't want to?
110 comments
Would you still eat meat if you had to kill the animal yourself?
109 comments
Is judging someone by their height as shallow as judging by their weight?
108 comments
Are dating apps genuinely harder for men or for women?
108 comments