Debatika
Technology & AI3w ago · 22 comments

Mario Kart World costs $80 at launch — is Nintendo finally pricing itself out of its own fanbase, or will we all just pay it anyway?

Nintendo just confirmed Mario Kart World will launch at $80, making it one of the most expensive first-party titles ever from the company. Some are calling it a turning point where nostalgia stops being worth the price tag, while others say Nintendo games hold their value forever so it doesn't matter. Is this the beginning of the end for Nintendo's goodwill, or are we about to watch millions of people prove the price is totally fine by buying it day one?

Join the debate to comment

Reading is free. Members pay to post — that's why it stays clean.

Add your comment

22 comments

  • Leo3w ago

    eighty dollars is eighty dollars. I have two kids. That's a week of groceries for us. I don't care how good the game is.

  • Elena3w ago

    My daughter is seven and she has been asking for the new Switch 2 since we saw the trailer. I already told her we'd get it for her birthday. I did not tell her about the $80 game. I am not looking forward to that conversation.

  • Casey3w ago

    I actually think $80 is fine and the game will be incredible but I refuse to say that publicly to anyone in my life because I don't want to hear it

  • Ravi3w ago

    I've bought every mainline Mario Kart since the SNES. I bought it today. I have no regrets and I refuse to have regrets.

  • Zara3w ago

    The real question isn't whether the game is worth $80. It's whether we want to live in a world where $80 is normal. Because once we accept it we never go back. That's the line. Not the game.

  • Yuki K.3w ago

    Nintendo could release a blank disc called "Mario" and charge $120 and the subreddit would post 40 page essays about why it's actually a bargain

  • Riley3w ago

    I work in games retail and I can already tell you preorders are strong. People complain online and buy in stores. They always have. The discourse is fake, the sales are real.

  • Theo3w ago

    that inflation argument is technically true but also completely useless because wages haven't kept up with inflation either so it's not actually helpful to anyone buying the game lmao

  • Feli3w ago

    what i find funny is gamers will spend $80 on cosmetics in a live service game without blinking but a fully featured complete experience at $80 is suddenly a crime against humanity. priorities are interesting

  • Avery _x3w ago

    This is genuinely the hill I will die on: Nintendo has been getting away with charging full price for games that came out on worse hardware years earlier and people STILL defend them. $80 is just them seeing how far the rubber band stretches before it snaps. It WILL snap eventually.

  • Jordan3w ago

    What gets me is that Nintendo is simultaneously the most beloved and most anti-consumer major games company and somehow those two things coexist peacefully in the fanbase. If Sony or Microsoft pulled this people would riot. Nintendo does it and everyone says "well the games are just THAT good." It's brand Stockholm syndrome.

  • Elena3w ago

    Nobody is talking about the fact that this sets a precedent for digital pricing too. Physical you can at least resell. If digital also goes to $80 with no resale value that's a genuinely different conversation about what we're actually buying.

  • Casey3w ago

    I think the more interesting story is what this signals for the rest of the industry. If Nintendo gets away with $80 and it charts for months, Activision and EA will have $80 games by Christmas. Nintendo isn't just setting their own price, they're setting an industry ceiling everyone else will race to touch.

  • Kofi3w ago

    ok but mario kart 8 deluxe was literally sold for like 6 years at full price and never dropped. nintendo games dont depreciate. you're basically buying an asset lol

  • Omar3w ago

    me and my four siblings grew up on one N64 cartridge we had for six years. the idea of any of us individually owning a new $80 game was science fiction. generationally this conversation is so wild to read. kids now are so used to having their own everything

  • Yuki3w ago

    My partner and I have a rule: no game over $40 unless we both agree it passes the "will we still be playing this in 6 months" test. Mario Kart World passes. It will probably be in our rotation until the Switch 3 comes out. Worth it.

  • Hana3w ago

    The only correct take here is: wait six months, buy used for $45, everyone wins except Nintendo. Vote with your wallet or stop complaining.

  • Leo 213w ago

    Genuine question: at what price would Nintendo fans actually stop buying? Like is there an actual number or is it just infinite elasticity? Asking as an economist, not sarcasting.

  • Feli3w ago

    The game supports open world traversal between tracks which is genuinely new for the series. This isn't a port, it's not a remaster, it's a full new game with a new mechanic. $80 for genuine innovation is different from $70 for the same FIFA with updated rosters.

  • Morgan3w ago

    The $80 price point is $80. Call of Duty is $70 and nobody clutches pearls. Mario Kart has more replay value in one cup than most shooters have in their entire campaign. Do the math.

  • Kofi3w ago

    I waited three years for Mario Kart 8 to go on sale. It never did. I eventually paid full price anyway. I'm done waiting this time. Pre-ordered week one and I feel fine about it.

  • Taylor M.3w ago

    The $80 price actually makes total economic sense when you factor in inflation adjusted against the 1990 SNES launch price of $49.99. In real terms Nintendo games are cheaper now than they were 35 years ago. People just don't account for that.

More debates people can't stop arguing about